Negatives of Neonicotinoids

Bumblebee

Bumblebee

The use of neonicotinoid insecticides was widely adopted in the 1990s as one of the few effective pesticides against sweet potato whitefly and other sucking insects. Some of the organophospates with high toxicity to humans were displaced by neonicotinoids with low toxicity to humans, greatly reducing the human health hazards.

Neonicotinoid use has grown in the last decade, especially as seed treatments. Many crop seeds are only sold treated with neonicotinoids as a “seed insurance” whether or not the grower wants it. The neonicotinoids are being used against variable insect pests that may not even be present. In such situations, harm outweighs benefit. Neonicotinoids have long residual life in the soil and are water soluble. Neonicotinoids are detectable in surface waters near agricultural areas. Plants absorb neonicotinoid from the soil and translocate it into the tissues and plant fluids such as nectar. Neonicotinoids are orders of magnitude more toxic to bees than the insecticide carbaryl, previously the chief cause of complaints from beekeepers. These are all reasons why use should be limited to only where absolutely necessary.

A group of Dutch scientists* have found a correlation between declining populations of some insectivorous birds and neonicotinoid use. They suggest that their observed effect may be due to direct effects of neonicotinoids in the bird’s diet or an indirect effect by decreasing the insect food available to birds. Correlation is not causation and the link needs more supporting evidence to be widely accepted. Aside from the new concerns about birds, there are other concerns that overuse of neonicotinoids on multiple crops will lead to pest resistance. The history of modern synthetic insecticides is filled with instances of insecticide overuse for short term gain leading to resistance and loss of sustainable value.

*Caspar A. Hallmann, Ruud P. B. Foppen, Chris A. M. van Turnhout, Hans de Kroon & Eelke Jongejans. 2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature: 17 JULY 2014, VOL 511: 341-4.
doi:10.1038/nature13531

About jjneal

Jonathan Neal is an Associate Professor of Entomology at Purdue University and author of the textbook, Living With Insects (2010). This blog is a forum to communicate about the intersection of insects with people and policy. This is a personal blog. The opinions and materials posted here are those of the author and are in no way connected with those of my employer.
This entry was posted in by jjneal, Environment, News, Pest Management, Policy. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Negatives of Neonicotinoids

  1. anastaciast says:

    Does this have anything to do with hive collapse?

    • jjneal says:

      There are multiple factors in so called “colony collapse disorder”. They are not all related. Honey bees have multiple stressors. One of the most important is mites. That said, high neonicotinoid exposure can kill a hive.

  2. GarryRogers says:

    Thank you for the discussion. Scooped and reblogged. See in the Nature Conservation News (https://www.rebelmouse.com/GarryRogers).

  3. Pingback: Soybean Seed Treatments | Living With Insects Blog

  4. Pingback: Swimming With Neonicotinoids | Living With Insects Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s